The Future of Science Evaluation

Evaluation of the Public knowledge to the New Level

By 201d, the number of online articles has increased to 9600 ing 190,000 articles worldwide - a great share of public knowledge. Most digital articles lack the essential scientific and technical quality. Improving these articles can improve the quality and credibility level of public knowledge. Health Sciences mission is to improve articles worldwide. Once a article is applied to ASI, 400 aspects of the article are evaluated based on 400 defined standards in five stages, and Article-Factor is computed. The article receives a detailed evaluation report for each of the 400 items and the total Article-Factor of the Article to improve the article based on.

Evaluation Ethics and Evaluation Malpractice Statement:

A referee evaluates a article based on standards regardless of religious, race, gender, sexual orientation, and belief of article owner. The evaluation process should be performed neutrally. Referee should state his views about the article clearly with supporting opinions. The Article Article-Factor is an average of five factors: Article Basics Factor, Article Transparency Factor, Article Article Factor, Article Operation Factor, Article International Availability Factor. The referee will consider similarity or overlap between the content of the article under consideration and other articles. The article can be continuously improved based on the defined standards for a new Article-Factor.