The Future of Science Evaluation

Evaluation of the Public knowledge to the New Level

By 201d, the number of online journals has increased to 9600 publishing 190,000 articles worldwide - a great share of public knowledge. Most digital journals lack the essential scientific and technical quality. Improving these journals can improve the quality and credibility level of public knowledge. mission is to improve journals worldwide. Once a journal is applied to ASI, 400 aspects of the journal are evaluated based on 400 defined standards in five stages, and ASI-Factor is computed. The journal receives a detailed evaluation report for each of the 400 items and the total ASI-Factor of the Journal to improve the journal based on.

Evaluation Ethics and Evaluation Malpractice Statement:

A referee evaluates a journal based on standards regardless of religious, race, gender, sexual orientation, and belief of journal owner. The evaluation process should be performed neutrally. Referee should state his views about the journal clearly with supporting opinions. The Journal ASI-Factor is an average of five factors: Journal Basics Factor, Journal Transparency Factor, Journal Article Factor, Journal Operation Factor, Journal International Availability Factor. The referee will consider similarity or overlap between the content of the journal under consideration and other journals. The journal can be continuously improved based on the defined standards for a new ASI-Factor.